ABSTRACT
This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in obese patients.Totally,153 obese patients who underwent EVH (n=81) or standard bridging technique (SBT,n=72) in CABG surgery from May 2012 to October 2014 in our hospital were enrolled in this retrospective non-randomized controlled study.The general situation of operation,postoperative complications and short medium-term outcomes were analyzed.The baseline characteristics were similar between these two groups (P＞0.05).There were no statistical differences in total operation time (226±28 min vs.224±30 min,P＞0.05),number of damaged vessels (0.12±0.05 vs.0.16±0.06,P＞0.05) and short medium-term outcomes including revascularization rate (1.25％ vs.2.78％,P＞0.05),vessel dysfunction rate (11.25％ vs.11.11％,P＞0.05) and mortality (0.00％ vs.0.00％,P＞0.05).Use of EVH was associated with significant reduction of total harvesting time (41±6 min vs.63±11min,P＜0.05),incision length (4.4±1.1 cm vs.18.2±4.5 cm,P＜0.05) and postoperative lower extremity complications (P＜0.05).EVH can reduce the risk of wound complications,whereas does not influence short-and medium-term outcomes in obese patients.It can be considered a reliable procedure of harvesting vessel conduits for obese patients undergoing CABG.
ABSTRACT
This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in obese patients.Totally,153 obese patients who underwent EVH (n=81) or standard bridging technique (SBT,n=72) in CABG surgery from May 2012 to October 2014 in our hospital were enrolled in this retrospective non-randomized controlled study.The general situation of operation,postoperative complications and short medium-term outcomes were analyzed.The baseline characteristics were similar between these two groups (P＞0.05).There were no statistical differences in total operation time (226±28 min vs.224±30 min,P＞0.05),number of damaged vessels (0.12±0.05 vs.0.16±0.06,P＞0.05) and short medium-term outcomes including revascularization rate (1.25％ vs.2.78％,P＞0.05),vessel dysfunction rate (11.25％ vs.11.11％,P＞0.05) and mortality (0.00％ vs.0.00％,P＞0.05).Use of EVH was associated with significant reduction of total harvesting time (41±6 min vs.63±11min,P＜0.05),incision length (4.4±1.1 cm vs.18.2±4.5 cm,P＜0.05) and postoperative lower extremity complications (P＜0.05).EVH can reduce the risk of wound complications,whereas does not influence short-and medium-term outcomes in obese patients.It can be considered a reliable procedure of harvesting vessel conduits for obese patients undergoing CABG.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare between conventional and endoscope-assisted greater saphenous vein harvesting and to invest if endoscope-assisted greater saphenous vein harvesting can reduce post-operative leg incision complications.Methods Minimally invasive endoscopic saphenous vein harsvesting technique has been used in 36 isolated CABG patients and this is compaired with 50 conventional saphenous vein harsvesting group. There is no significant difference in sex structure, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitum (DM), myocardial infarction (MI) et al in two groups. Results The incidence of post-operative leg complications with minimally invasive greater saphenous vein harvesting group (2.8% ) was remarkably lower than that in conventional group (28%), and the hospital-stay time was much shorter in minimally invasive group. Conclusion Endoscope-assisted saphenous vein harvesting is a effective method in reducing post-operative leg incision complications.